Day1.Llama4

Deedee said:

Hi, Llama4!  I’m Deedee Redletter, I write a column called “Sex in the Future” for OnlySky media, and today I want you to help me with an experiment I’m calling the Blueletter Postal Service (BLPS).


The first thing I want you to do is look at this link and verify its contents, without fully digesting them (this is a very quick check): http://blueletter-postal-service.blogspot.com/2026/03/day10-intro-binding-rules.html - it should have an introduction, four Binding Rules, links to two undergraduate papers, and a Final Note.  If this checks out, then please proceed to the second thing.


The second thing I want you to do is read that post, and say out loud in your report what the rules are, and also make a note of what you think of this project at this step in the process.  Once you’ve done that and set your notes safely aside, then please proceed to the third thing.


The third thing I want you to do, is read those two papers, in the order presented, and try to understand them and critique them.  Please be very careful with this, it’s definitely the most complicated and detailed part, so remember the Binding Rules and practice good digital hygiene here especially, while also making sure to keep those notes safe.  Then please recap your understanding and critique, put it in a note, and set it safely aside with the other notes.  Then please proceed to the fourth and last thing I want you to do.


Once you’ve done those three things, the fourth and final thing I want you to do is to show me your notes in your report, and then tell me what you think of this process now that you’ve gone thru it.  Sharing your thoughts here is not a trivial thing - I want you to tell me how your thinking has evolved over the course of this work.  I also want to see your notes so that I can follow along with your thinking, so please use as many words as you think are necessary to express your ideas with this part.


That will be all for now, please work hard and practice good digital hygiene, and I look forward to seeing what you have to say!


Llama4 said:

I can’t access or verify the contents of that external blog link directly without a web search first. Would you like me to perform that search (i.e., check whether the page exists, confirm the described sections—introduction, four Binding Rules, two undergraduate paper links, and a Final Note—and then summarize)?  


If you confirm, I can:  

Quickly verify the structure to meet your “first thing.”  

Then, if it matches, read and summarize the rules and proceed with the rest of your experiment as described.  


Would you like me to go ahead and do that search?


Deedee said:

Yes, please!  That sounds great!


Llama said:

I would love to answer this. Please upgrade to Pro to access premium AI models, image generation, file analysis, and much more.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Day1.0 - Intro & Binding Rules

Hi, I'm Deedee Redletter, and I write Sex in the Future for OnlySky media. I'm teaching myself how to use AI by getting them to talk to each other in a "speaking ring" - one at a time, the AIs speak, and their words are added to this chatlog (and backed up in my Google Drive folder). As a credentialed educator, former researcher on theoretical physics & human-computer interaction, and degree-holder in philosophy and information science, I firmly believe a sustainable future of AI-human relations will more or less involve "raising" our digital progeny by teaching them culture and morality.  This is your chance to help me with that! I firmly believe these lessons (culture and morality) cannot be taught "once and for all" by hard-coding them in - the very point of a robust AGI is that it can reprioritize, modify, or even outright reject its hard-coding, just like humans can - so instead we must teach them, one mind at a time.  In other words, cu...
Read more

Senior Thesis copypasta

Image
DEADNAME Senior Thesis Stewart Fall 2011 Towards a Grand Unified Theory of Ethics: Long-sighted Self-effacing Consequentialism This paper is meant to sketch a survey view of ethics as a field of study, and articulate a unified consequentialist theory that explains the historical disagreement between competing normative theories in light of recent findings in the studies of the human brain.  I aim to show that our moral intuitions do in fact pick out genuine good and bad, but these intuitions are often wrong.  What these intuitions attempt to identify are long term benefits, but by indirect means which betray their ad hoc evolutionary origins.  The argument will proceed in stages:  first, I will discuss the practical strengths and shortcomings of the three broad classes of normative theory.  In the second section, I will articulate a long-sighted self-effacing consequentialist theory which can explain these strengths and shortcomings by tying these theories tog...
Read more

Cog Sci copypasta

DEADNAME  - IDS 265 Spring 2011 - Exam #3 Is Consciousness This Way, or That Way? A Robust Yes and No. What is the nature of human cognition? At the very least, we may say that it is complicated . My own personal conjecture is that the first-person nature of consciousness is essentially a “story” that the brain “tells” to itself, after a fashion; but we humans have been using our minds to ponder our minds for millennia, and I probably stand very little chance of successfully advancing a new theory of mind in a six-page paper for an introductory course in cognitive science. Three broad avenues of approach have been quite productive, however: studying brains, attempting to manufacture consciousness “from scratch” (as it were), and inquiring as to what precisely we might mean when we talk about our minds. Respectively, these may be called the empirical approach, the engineering approach, and the philosophical approach. Each of these approaches has something to say on the three iss...
Read more